Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1/2 Dirham - 'Ilkhan' Hulagu Khan

Uitgever Ilkhanate
Jaar 1256-1265
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Round (irregular)
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Epigraphic design featuring the Shahada (Islamic declaration of faith) inscribed in multiple lines across the field in Arabic Naskh script. The central legend reads the full profession of faith affirming the oneness of God and the prophethood of Muhammad. The inscription is arranged horizontally in three lines within the coin's field, enclosed by a linear inner border and an outer beaded or dotted border following the irregular, flan edge. The surface displays characteristic hammer-struck relief with flat fields typical of early Ilkhanid silver coinage.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde لا إله إلا الله وحده لا شريك له محمد رسول الله
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Hulagu Khan established the Ilkhanate after the Mongol campaigns that destroyed Abbasid Baghdad in 1258 — the sack that ended five centuries of caliphal rule and killed Caliph Al-Musta'sim. The right to strike coinage was one of the first instruments of legitimacy Hulagu claimed, yet his early issues remain poorly systematized, with attribution disputes persisting across the major catalogs. Diler's numbering diverges from Album's sequence in ways that suggest the two scholars worked from different hoard compositions entirely.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT