See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1/2 Crown - Charles I Tower mint, under Parliament

Issuer Tower Mint, London
Year 1643-1646
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness 1.5 mm
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Equestrian effigy of King Charles I advancing to the left, depicted on horseback with an upright sword held in the right hand and a billowing cloak, the whole set against a plain field with no ground line, enclosed within a beaded border. The execution reflects the characteristically cruder workmanship of the Parliamentary issue period at the Tower Mint. The royal Latin legend is disposed around the periphery, interrupted by punctuation stops and abbreviation marks. The overall engraving quality is noticeably inferior to earlier Tower Mint issues, consistent with the disrupted production conditions of the Civil War era.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (1643-1644) - mm. P in brackets (98) -
ND (1644-1645) - mm. R in brackets (112) -
ND (1645) - mm. Eye (81) -
ND (1645-1646) - mm. Sun (120) -
Additional information

After Parliament seized the Tower of London in 1642, it continued striking coinage in Charles I's name — a pragmatic fiction that kept commerce moving while the Civil War bled on. The mint's output during these years served a government actively fighting its king, yet bore his image without apparent irony. Royalist mints at Oxford, Bristol, and Shrewsbury were simultaneously doing the same, producing competing issues of nominally identical authority.

Spink 2778 covers a span of dies across the 1643–1646 window, and individual pieces can often be attributed more narrowly by mintmark sequence — the sun, sceptre, and eye marks each corresponding to specific years within that range.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE