Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Maritime Southeast Asia |
|---|---|
| Year | 1700-1800 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (1700-1800) |
| Additional information |
Fractional gold coinages of this type circulated across the trading networks of the Gulf of Thailand and the Malay Peninsula, where small-denomination specie was essential for transactions that larger bullion pieces couldn't accommodate. The issuing authority behind pseudo-anonymous pieces like this one remains deliberately obscure — produced outside official royal mints, likely by merchant communities or local intermediaries operating within the port economy rather than any centralized polity.
At 0.13 g, consistent purity was the only guarantee of value. The Krischer/Mihailovic reference corpus remains the primary scholarly tool for attributing these.