Catalogue
| Émetteur | Miletopolis (Mysia) |
|---|---|
| Année | 300 BC - 101 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | |
| Devise | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Poids | 6.55 g |
| Diamètre | 20 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | CN type#19820 |
| Description de l’avers | Helmeted head of Athena facing. |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | Owl standing left, head facing. |
| Écriture du revers | Greek |
| Légende du revers | ΜΙΛΗΤΟ |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (300 BC - 101 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 8547743890 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: This Æ coin, issued by Miletopolis in Mysia between 300 and 101 BC, situates within the Hellenistic period, an era of shifting power dynamics following Alexander's empire. Miletopolis, a key city in northwest Asia Minor, navigated influence from the Seleucids, Attalids, and Bithynians before Roman ascendancy. This bronze coinage was vital for local commerce, affirming the city's civic identity and economic autonomy amidst the region's pervasive Hellenization.
Artistry: The anonymous engraver's work aligns with the Hellenistic stylistic school, favoring naturalism and expressive detail. The obverse typically presents a finely rendered, laureate head of Zeus facing right, displaying robust features and dynamic hair. The reverse commonly features an eagle standing left, wings folded, often with a civic monogram. The execution shows careful attention to plumage and form, reflecting the period's artistic sophistication.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a 20mm flan at 6.55g, this Æ type exhibits typical Hellenistic bronze strike variability. Key high-points for wear assessment include Zeus's hair and facial contours, and the eagle's breast, head, and feather details. Well-struck, preserved examples retain full detail in these areas. Flan irregularity and centering variations are common, influencing overall technical grade.