カタログ
| 発行体 | Harpasa (Caria) |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 100 BC - 30 BC |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | |
| 通貨 | Drachm |
| 材質 | Bronze |
| 重量 | 1.63 g |
| 直径 | 13 mm |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 製造技法 | Hammered |
| 向き | Variable alignment ↺ |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 | HN Online#1119 , SNG Copenhagen#388 |
| 表面の説明 | Laureate head of Zeus right. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | |
| 表面の銘文 | |
| 裏面の説明 | Artemis standing right, holding bow in left hand and drawing arrow from quiver with right hand; in front, crested helmet. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | Greek |
| 裏面の銘文 | ΑΡΠΑΣΗ ΝΩΝ |
| 縁 | |
| 鋳造所 | |
| 鋳造数 |
ND (100 BC - 30 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 8340287450 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context: Harpasa, a city in Caria, issued this bronze coinage during the late Hellenistic period, roughly 100-30 BC. This era saw the gradual assertion of Roman power over Anatolia, yet many cities retained the right to strike their own bronze currency for local economic circulation. Such issues underscore the continued vitality of urban centers and their civic identity, even as they navigated the shifting geopolitical landscape from Rhodian influence to Roman provincial administration. This coin represents Harpasa's economic autonomy during a period of significant regional transition.
Artistry: While specific engravers for these smaller bronze issues are rarely identifiable, the coin reflects the prevalent late Hellenistic stylistic traditions of Anatolia. Designs typically featured local deities, such as Zeus or Artemis, or personifications of the city, often rendered in a somewhat provincial but competent manner. The small flan size of 13mm necessitated a compact design, focusing on essential iconographic elements rather than intricate detail, characteristic of utilitarian civic bronzes from this period. The style would have been familiar to the local populace, reinforcing civic pride and religious beliefs.
Technical/Grading: With a weight of 1.63 grams and a diameter of 13mm, this is a small-denomination bronze coin. High-points for such issues typically include the prominent features of any portrait or central elements of the reverse device. The strike quality often varies; bronze flans were frequently less carefully prepared and struck than their silver counterparts, leading to common occurrences of off-centering, uneven striking, or die wear. A well-centered example with clear devices on both sides, exhibiting minimal die wear, would be considered exceptional for this particular type and period.