Katalog
| İhraççı | Ziz |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 241 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | |
| Para birimi | Litra |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 6.83 g |
| Çap | 22 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | CNS#5 Copenhagen#518 4#554 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Head of Hera left, wearing stephane, decorated with palmettae. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Man-faced bull advancing left; above head of Helios, in exergue, SYS in punic characters. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | |
| Arka yüz lejandı | |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (-241) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 8104743140 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This Æ issue from Ziz, dated 241 BC, places it within the dynamic Hellenistic period. While Ziz's precise identity remains debated, numismatic evidence suggests it was likely an autonomous city-state or minor kingdom in the Near East, asserting sovereignty through its own currency. This coin reflects local economic stability and the ruler's authority amidst the geopolitical competition of the Diadochi successor states.
Artistry: The coin's design exemplifies the Hellenistic artistic tradition, marked by naturalism and idealized forms. While no engraver is named, the work suggests a skilled die-cutter, likely trained in a regional school influenced by Attic or Alexandrian workshops. The obverse typically features a laureate head, perhaps a local deity or deified ruler. The reverse often displays a symbolic motif pertinent to Ziz, such as an agricultural emblem or civic device, executed with a clear hand.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze, weighing 6.83 grams and measuring 22 millimeters, this coin represents a substantial denomination. Typical strikes for this series often show minor flan irregularities and occasional off-centering, common for bronze issues of the period. Key high-points for grading include the hair and facial features on the obverse portrait, and the intricacies of the central reverse device. Well-preserved examples exhibit clear device separation from the field, with minimal wear.