Danh mục
| Đơn vị phát hành | Ziz |
|---|---|
| Năm | 300 BC - 200 BC |
| Loại | Standard circulation coin |
| Mệnh giá | |
| Tiền tệ | Litra |
| Chất liệu | Bronze |
| Trọng lượng | 10.05 g |
| Đường kính | 23 mm |
| Độ dày | |
| Hình dạng | Round (irregular) |
| Kỹ thuật | Hammered |
| Hướng | |
| Nghệ nhân khắc | |
| Lưu hành đến | |
| Tài liệu tham khảo | CNS#15 4#561-562 2#1068 |
| Mô tả mặt trước | Helmeted head of Athena right. |
|---|---|
| Chữ viết mặt trước | |
| Chữ khắc mặt trước | |
| Mô tả mặt sau | Triskeles with Medusa head. |
| Chữ viết mặt sau | |
| Chữ khắc mặt sau | |
| Cạnh | |
| Xưởng đúc | |
| Số lượng đúc |
ND (300 BC - 200 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6811667800 |
| Thông tin bổ sung |
Historical Context: This Æ issue from Ziz dates to the Hellenistic period, circa 300-200 BC. During this era, numerous city-states and regional powers issued bronze coinage to facilitate local commerce and assert civic identity. Ziz's issuance of a substantial bronze denomination (10.05g, 23mm) suggests economic autonomy and a need for stable currency within its influence, typical of the post-Alexandrian world where local economies thrived.
Artistry: The artistry of this Ziz Æ coin reflects broader Hellenistic stylistic trends for bronze issues. Engravers, typically anonymous, often drew upon local mythological traditions or civic emblems. Common motifs included patron deities, local heroes, or agricultural products, rendered in styles ranging from robust provincial to detailed Hellenistic realism. Die work aimed to convey civic pride and religious devotion, typical of the period's numismatic iconography, often lacking the refined detail of silver or gold issues.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 10.05 grams and measuring 23 mm, this coin represents a medium-sized bronze denomination. Technical strike quality on Hellenistic bronzes often varies, with common issues including off-centering, uneven flan preparation, and variable die wear. High points for typical designs—such as hair or facial features of a deity, or raised elements of an architectural or symbolic reverse—are susceptible to wear. A well-struck example exhibits clear details on both sides, with minimal weakness in central motifs.