Catalog
| Issuer | Sermyle |
|---|---|
| Year | 400 BC - 301 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 1.66 g |
| Diameter | 12 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | HGC 3.1#667 , Klein#1136 |
| Obverse description | Head of female right, wearing sphendone. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Grain ear. |
| Reverse script | Greek |
| Reverse lettering | ΣΕΡΜΥΛΙΑΙΩΝ |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (400 BC - 301 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 2733850230 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: Sermyle, an ancient Macedonian city, issued this Æ bronze coinage between 400 and 301 BC. This period spanned the late Classical to early Hellenistic eras, witnessing significant political upheaval and the rise of Macedonian power. Such modest bronze denominations primarily served local economic needs, facilitating daily commerce within Sermyle's sphere of influence and reflecting its civic autonomy in managing internal trade during a transformative time for the Greek world.
Artistry: The artistic style aligns with Late Classical Greek numismatics, moving towards early Hellenistic naturalism. While specific design elements are not detailed, contemporary bronze issues from Macedonian poleis frequently depicted local deities like Apollo or Artemis, or civic symbols such as animals or agricultural motifs. The engraver, typical for these civic bronzes, remains anonymous. Hand-cut dies resulted in unique impressions, often showcasing a robust, rustic charm characteristic of local craftsmanship rather than imperial mints.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a 12mm bronze flan weighing 1.66 grams, this Æ coin presents typical features of small module ancient bronzes. High-points for preservation generally include central design elements, such as a deity's facial features or an animal's musculature, which are susceptible to wear. Strike quality often varies, with minor off-centering or weak impressions common due to manual striking methods. Planchet irregularities, including uneven thickness or slight porosity, are also frequently observed.