Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Choresmia (ancient) |
|---|---|
| Year | 50-100 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Choresmian |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (50-100) |
| Additional information |
Chorasmian coinage of the mid-first-century range remains among the least systematically documented in Central Asian numismatics. Vainberg's typology, developed through Soviet-era excavations primarily around ancient Kath and Toprak-kala, is still the foundational reference, though attribution of individual rulers within the Middle Period sequence remains contested — many "rulers" are identified solely by die groupings rather than any textual corroboration.
The Zeno catalog number suggests this piece has passed through collector documentation, but Chorasmian bronzes of this period rarely surface with excavation provenance intact.