See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Unknown Æ - Uncertain Ruler Samarqand

Issuer Samarqand (ancient)
Year 575-601
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter 22 mm
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Stylized bust of a ruler facing right, depicted in low relief within a circular border or ring. The portrait is rendered in a schematic, heavily abstracted Sogdian artistic style typical of pre-Islamic Central Asian coinage, with minimal facial detail discernible due to the broad, flat flan and heavy surface patination. No visible inscription or legend surrounds the effigy.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Central device consisting of a stylized tamgha or dynastic symbol, possibly a trident or arrow-like motif, set within a circular border or ring. The device is rendered in the schematic manner characteristic of Sogdian civic coinage of Samarqand during the late 6th to early 7th century. The field is otherwise plain, with no surrounding legend visible.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Samarqand's pre-Islamic bronze coinage from this period operated within a complex web of Sogdian city-state authority, often striking in the name of local rulers whose identities remain unresolved in the written record. Smirnova's corpus, published in 1981, remains the foundational reference for this material, though attribution continues to be revised as new finds from Central Asian excavations refine the typological sequence.

The "uncertain ruler" designation here is not evasion — it reflects genuine gaps that decades of scholarship have not closed.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE