Catalog
| Issuer | Bukhara Sogd (ancient) |
|---|---|
| Year | 550-601 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Smirnova#–, Zeimal#12 |
| Obverse description | Draped bust of a ruler depicted in three-quarter facing right, rendered in the schematic Central Asian artistic tradition typical of early Sogdian coinage. The effigy displays a crowned or helmeted head with stylized facial features, set within a beaded border encircling the flan. The relief is worn but the general outline of the figure and drapery folds remain discernible. The field surrounding the bust is largely plain, with surface patination obscuring finer details. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (550-601) |
| Additional information |
Bukharan bronze issues of this period were produced under the Bukhar-Khudats, a dynasty of local rulers who maintained a degree of autonomy even as successive waves of Hephthalite and then Western Türk overlordship reshaped the political order across Sogdia. The coinage functioned within a regional market economy that was deeply tied to Silk Road exchange, and these small bronzes circulated alongside Sasanian silver in the bazaars of a city that Arab geographers would later describe as among the wealthiest in Central Asia.
Zeimal's type 12 classification places this piece within a recognized sequence, though the Smirnova corpus leaves it unnumbered — a gap that reflects how inconsistently this material was documented before systematic die studies began in the late Soviet period.