See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Unknown Æ - Anonymous Ferghana, facing left, with cross, regular tamgha

Issuer Ferghana Khaganate
Year 649-801
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Central device consisting of the characteristic lyre-shaped tamgha of Ferghana, distinguished by a cross motif in its centre, the whole forming the dynastic emblem of the ruling house. The tamgha occupies the central field and is surrounded by a circular Sogdian legend running along the periphery of the flan. The design is typical of the anonymous bronze coinage attributed to the Ferghana Khaganate, combining the local dynastic symbol with a Sogdian religious or honorific inscription invoking divine grace.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering prn bgy d`r
(Translation: Farnbag, by the Grace of God)
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The Ferghana valley, wedged between the Syr Darya and the Tian Shan range, sat at one of the most contested chokepoints on the Silk Road during the seventh and eighth centuries — fought over successively by the Western Türk Khaganate, Tang China, and the expanding Umayyad caliphate. These anonymous bronzes were produced under local rulers who navigated that pressure by adapting coinage traditions from multiple directions simultaneously, which explains the hybrid iconographic vocabulary that makes attribution so difficult. The cross motif on this type has generated genuine scholarly disagreement about Nestorian Christian influence versus purely decorative borrowing.

Smirnova's catalog remains the foundational reference, though her numbering was assembled before several Ferghana hoards surfaced in the 1990s that complicated the sequence.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE