Catalog
| Issuer | Hathoda, City of |
|---|---|
| Year | 200 BC - 100 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Central tree motif with spreading branches and visible roots, rendered in low relief in a schematic, archaic style characteristic of early Indian punch-marked and cast coinage. Flanking the tree are two attendant figures in adoration or worship posture, one to each side, possibly representing yaksha or devotee figures. A Brahmi legend encircles or accompanies the design within the field. The overall composition is irregular and densely arranged within the flan. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Uniface; the reverse is blank and unworked, showing only the rough, uneven surface of the cast copper flan with no design, inscription, or intentional relief. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Hathoda remains poorly documented in the numismatic literature, and attributions to this issuing authority rest on a relatively small corpus of excavated and provenanced material. The copper unit coinage of this region fits within the broader punch-marked and cast traditions of early Indian civic issues, where municipal or local chieftain authorities produced low-denomination currency for localized exchange rather than long-distance trade.
Without a confirmed hoard context or epigraphic anchor, chronological placement within the second century BC window carries inherent uncertainty.