Katalog
| Emittent | Perrhaiboi |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 125 BC - 75 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Trichalkon (1⁄16) |
| Währung | Drachm |
| Material | Bronze |
| Gewicht | 7.38 g |
| Durchmesser | 20.0 mm |
| Dicke | |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Hammered |
| Ausrichtung | |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | BCD Thessaly I#1247, SNG Copenhagen#197, Rogers#440 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Laureate head of Zeus to right |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | |
| Averslegende | |
| Reversbeschreibung | Hera, draped, seated on throne to right, holding long scepter with her right hand and resting her left on her knee. To the right, monogram of ΣΩ. |
| Reversschrift | Greek |
| Reverslegende | ΠΕΡΡΑΙ ΒΩΝ |
| Rand | |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
ND (125 BC - 75 BC) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 1180627690 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: This Trichalkon, issued by the Perrhaiboi between 125 BC and 75 BC, originates from a transitional period in the Hellenistic world. The Perrhaiboi, an ancient Greek tribe in northern Thessaly, maintained civic autonomy despite growing Roman influence following the Macedonian Wars. This bronze coinage served as essential daily currency, reflecting the Perrhaiboi's continued economic vitality and local self-governance within the broader Roman sphere, underscoring their enduring identity.
Artistry: The engraver of this Trichalkon remains anonymous, typical for civic bronze issues of the Late Hellenistic period. Stylistically, such coins aimed to convey local identity and values through their designs, often featuring deities, heroes, or pertinent symbols. The artistry was functional, designed for clear recognition in everyday transactions. This aesthetic aligns with the practical yet symbolic nature of Hellenistic bronze coinage, emphasizing the Perrhaiboi's cultural and political self-assertion.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze, this Trichalkon measures 20.0 mm and weighs 7.38 grams, consistent with its denomination. Bronze issues of this period often exhibit variations in strike quality; centering and full detail on high-points are key indicators of a superior specimen. Preservation of fine details, especially on any portraiture or intricate reverse elements, is crucial. A stable, attractive patina is also vital. Its identification is affirmed by scholarly references: BCD Thessaly I#1247, SNG Copenhagen#197, and Rogers#440.