See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

⅓ Thaler - Max Gandolf von Kuenburg Brandenburg-Prussia, Countermarked

Issuer Archbishopric of Salzburg
Year 1681
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Thaler
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A large crowned composite shield bearing the quartered coat of arms of the Electorate of Brandenburg occupies the central field, displaying the various heraldic quarterings including the eagle, scepters, and lion devices associated with the Hohenzollern dynasty. The crown surmounting the shield is rendered in high relief with fine detail. The date 1667 is divided across the upper field flanking the crown, while the mintmaster's initials GF appear in the lower exergue. The encircling legend, reading clockwise, identifies the coin as new silver coinage in abbreviated Latin.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Max Gandolf von Kuenburg, Archbishop of Salzburg from 1668 to 1687, governed one of the wealthiest ecclesiastical territories in the Holy Roman Empire — its silver mines at Gastein and Rauris fed a prolific mint output throughout his episcopate. The Brandenburg-Prussia countermark on this piece reflects the fractured monetary reality of the Empire, where foreign and regional coins circulated freely and local authorities restruck or countermarked them to assert tariff control or validate them at a specific exchange rate within their jurisdiction.

The Zöttl reference places this among a documented series of countermarked types, suggesting systematic application rather than incidental reuse.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE