See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm Unfaithful Legend Type

Issuer Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Year 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight 13.69 g
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Celticized laureate head of Zeus facing left, rendered in the characteristic stylized barbarous manner derived from Macedonian prototypes of Philip II. The facial features are boldly abstracted, with a large prominent eye, exaggerated brow, and a flowing beard indicated by incised lines. The laureate wreath encircling the head is rendered as a series of elongated leaf forms with pronounced Celtic artistic interpretation. The flan is irregular and slightly convex, with no legend present on the obverse.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Celtic coinage in the eastern Balkans descended from Macedonian prototypes — Philip II tetradrachms copied so persistently that the designs degraded through successive generations of imitation into near-abstraction. The "Unfaithful Legend" designation refers specifically to the garbled or pseudo-epigraphic inscription derived from Philip's original ΦΙΛΙΠΠΟΥ, rendered by celts who had no literacy in Greek into sequences of meaningless strokes and curves.

Attribution to a specific tribal group remains impossible. The Kostial reference places it within a broad Danubian tradition, but the actual striking location could fall anywhere across a wide arc from Thrace to the Carpathian basin.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE