Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Eastern European Celts |
|---|---|
| Year | 200 BC - 1 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (200 BC - 1 BC) |
| Additional information |
The Thasian tetradrachm became the dominant trade coin across Thrace and the middle Danube basin from roughly the late third century BC onward, and Celtic tribes in the region began producing imitations so prolifically that the copies eventually outnumbered the Thasian originals in circulation. What started as close copies progressively abstracted — each generation of dies moving further from the prototype until the imagery became nearly unrecognizable, a process numismatists call "devolution." Göbl's classification system attempts to impose order on this sprawling series, but attribution to a specific tribe or workshop remains genuinely difficult for most specimens.