Catalog
| Issuer | Characene, Kingdom of |
|---|---|
| Year | 81 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Tetradrachm (4) |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | |
| Diameter | |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) |
| Obverse description | Diademed head to right. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Zeus seated to left on throne, holding sceptre and tied diadem. |
| Reverse script | Greek |
| Reverse lettering | BAΣIΛEΩΣ IΠΠOKPATOPOY AYTOKPATOPOΣ NIKHΦOPOY BΛΣ |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
232 (81 BC) - BΛΣ - |
| Numisquare ID | 3302176380 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Tetradrachm, struck in 81 BC by the Kingdom of Characene, represents a significant issue under the ruler known as Hippokrates Autokrator Nikephoros. Characene, a crucial trading state at the head of the Persian Gulf, frequently navigated a complex political landscape, often asserting independence from its Parthian overlords. The epithets "Autokrator" (self-ruler) and "Nikephoros" (victory-bearer) on this coinage are powerful declarations, suggesting a period of significant military success and a strong assertion of sovereignty by Hippokrates, possibly following a decisive victory or during a period of Parthian weakness. This coin thus serves as a tangible testament to Characene's economic prosperity and its rulers' ambitions for regional dominance.
Artistry: The artistry of this Tetradrachm reflects a blend of Hellenistic tradition and local stylistic preferences characteristic of Characene coinage. While no specific engraver is known, the dies were cut by skilled artisans working within a regional school that adapted Greek numismatic conventions. The obverse typically features a regal, idealized portrait of Hippokrates, often rendered with a distinctive facial structure and drapery that, while Hellenistic in origin, shows a gradual evolution towards more stylized forms. The reverse design would commonly depict a seated deity, such as Herakles or Tyche, often with Greek legends surrounding the figure, further underscoring the enduring cultural influence of the Seleucid era even as Characene developed its own unique numismatic identity.
Technical/Grading: From a technical perspective, the strike quality of Characene Tetradrachms can vary, but well-preserved examples of this issue demonstrate excellent craftsmanship. Key high-points for wear and strike quality on the obverse include the ruler's hair, nose, and the folds of his drapery. On the reverse, the head, limbs, and attributes of the seated deity are crucial areas. A premium example would exhibit a strong, even strike across a full, well-centered flan, with sharp details and minimal die wear. Minor off-centering or areas of weakness are common for the period, but a superior strike will show full legends and a well-defined portrait, indicative of careful production on a robust silver planchet.