Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Eastern European Celts |
|---|---|
| Year | 300 BC - 201 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Rider on horseback advancing to left, depicted in a vigorous, stylised Celtic manner derived from Macedonian coin prototypes. The horse is shown with an exaggerated, muscular body, its forelegs raised in a prancing posture, with one hoof distinctively rendered in the characteristic 'Eingesetzter Pferdefuß' (inserted horse-foot) style — a defining feature of this type. The rider sits upright with arms extended, and a small animal or zoomorphic device appears above the horse in the upper field. The overall composition fills the flan with energetic, abstracted forms typical of eastern Celtic die engraving. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (300 BC - 201 BC) |
| Additional information |
The "Eingesetzter Pferdefuß" types — named by German-speaking scholars for the inserted horse-leg motif — belong to a cluster of imitative issues derived ultimately from Philip II of Macedon's tetradrachm coinage, filtered through several generations of Celtic copying across the middle Danube region. Attributing these to a specific tribe remains unresolved; "Uncertain Eastern European Celts" is the honest answer where others have sometimes invented precision.
The Göbl reference places this within a tightly defined die study, which is the most reliable framework available for these otherwise undocumented issues.