Catalogue
| Émetteur | Birytis |
|---|---|
| Année | 350 BC - 300 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | Tetrachalkon (1⁄12) |
| Devise | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Poids | 5.4 g |
| Diamètre | 18 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | GCV#4056 |
| Description de l’avers | Non-bearded bust of Kabeiros wearing pileus, facing left, with stars around. |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | Legend within wreath. |
| Écriture du revers | Greek |
| Légende du revers |
B I P Y (Translation: Birytis) |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (350 BC - 300 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 4398899580 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: This Tetrachalkon was issued by the ancient Greek city of Birytis in Thrace, on the Propontis, during a period of significant geopolitical flux (350-300 BC). This era saw the decline of Persian influence and the rise of Macedonian power. Cities like Birytis often asserted autonomy through local bronze coinage, crucial for internal commerce when silver was less accessible. These issues reflected civic self-sufficiency amidst the powerful Macedonian expansion.
Artistry: While the engraver remains anonymous, this coin exemplifies Late Classical to early Hellenistic stylistic trends prevalent in Thracian Greek mints. The obverse typically features a finely rendered head of Demeter or Persephone, often wreathed, showcasing characteristic idealization and subtle naturalism. The reverse commonly depicts a dolphin, a symbol reflecting Birytis's maritime importance or a local cult, rendered with simple yet effective lines conveying movement. The overall design balance is characteristic of civic issues.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan (5.4 grams, 18 mm), this Tetrachalkon's technical quality varies. Key high-points for wear assessment include the hair details and facial contours of the obverse deity, and the fins and body of the reverse dolphin. Well-struck examples exhibit clear definition, often despite slightly irregular flans typical of bronze issues. Centering can be variable, and die wear frequently influences the sharpness of finer details, particularly on the ethnic inscription.