See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Srebrennik - Vladimir the Great type III

Issuer Kyivan Rus
Year 980-1015
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Central field displays the Rurikid dynastic trident (tamga), the personal symbol of Vladimir I, rendered in a bold, schematic style characteristic of early Kyivan Rus coinage. The trident motif is flanked by a beaded inner border and a rope-twist outer border, reflecting Byzantine decorative conventions adapted to local taste. The Cyrillic legend А СЕ ЕГО СРЕБРО ('And this is his silver') surrounds the central device along the coin's periphery, asserting the coin's monetary authority.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering А СЕ ЕГО СРЕБРО
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The srebrennik was struck at Vladimir's order following his conversion to Christianity in 988 and subsequent political alignment with Byzantium — the coins self-consciously mimicking the weight standard and visual grammar of contemporary Byzantine miliaresia, asserting dynastic legitimacy through a medium Rus audiences could read against imperial precedent. Type III is distinguished from the earlier types by specific changes to the trident tamga, Vladimir's dynastic symbol, which serves as the primary tool for typological classification across the srebrennik series. Production almost certainly took place in Kyiv, though no mint infrastructure from the period has been archaeologically confirmed.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE