Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Corieltauvi tribe |
|---|---|
| Year | 45 BC - 10 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Stater |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Celticized horse prancing to the right, depicted in the angular, abstracted style typical of East Midlands tribal coinage. A prominent annulet composed of pellets, possibly representing a solar symbol, appears above the horse's back. Pellet and lune devices are scattered in the field. The overall composition demonstrates the progressive abstraction of classical Macedonian prototypes characteristic of Late Iron Age British coinage. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (45 BC - 10 BC) |
| Additional information |
The Corieltauvi occupied a substantial territory across what is now Lincolnshire, Leicestershire, and Nottinghamshire, and are unusual among British Iron Age tribes for appearing to have operated with paired rulers — inscribed coins suggest joint authority rather than single kingship. The uninscribed types like this one predate that epigraphic phase, placing it in a period when tribal identity was expressed through die imagery alone rather than named authority.
British silver units of this region are frequently found as single-field losses rather than hoard material, suggesting active use rather than deliberate deposition.