Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Aulerci Eburovices |
|---|---|
| Year | 60 BC - 50 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | 15 mm |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Stylized boar advancing, rendered in a schematic La Tène Celtic style characteristic of the Aulerci Eburovices tribal coinage. The animal's body is depicted in profile with abstracted limbs and a prominent dorsal spine or bristle ridge suggested by linear relief. Pellet or annulet motifs may appear in the field as secondary decorative elements. No inscription or legend accompanies the design. The overall execution reflects the highly conventionalized imagery of Gaulish potin coinage from the mid-first century BC. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (60 BC - 50 BC) |
| Additional information |
The Aulerci Eburovices, centered around what is now Évreux in Normandy, were among the Gaulish tribes caught directly in the path of Caesar's campaigns of the late 50s BC. Potin — a cast tin-lead-copper alloy — was the workhorse coinage of northern Gaul precisely because it required no striking, only molds, making rapid production possible even under disrupted conditions. DT 2480 is a relatively localized type; Delestrée and Tache's attribution places it firmly within the Eburovican series rather than the broader Aulerci group issues.