Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Lorraine, Duchy of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1348-1372 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Plaque (0.1) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Half-length armored and helmeted effigy of Duke John I facing forward, depicted in a frontal martial pose. The duke holds an upright sword in his right hand and bears a shield blazoned with the arms of Lorraine in his left. The figure is rendered in the bold, stylized manner characteristic of 14th-century hammered coinage of the region. A circular Latin legend surrounds the central device within the coin's field. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (1348-1372) |
| Additional information |
John I of Lorraine ruled the duchy through the catastrophic years of the Black Death, which reached the region in 1348 — the same year this series begins. The plague so thoroughly disrupted trade and administration across Lorraine that maintaining consistent minting operations was itself a logistical achievement. His coinage drew heavily on French monetary conventions, reflecting decades of Capetian pressure on the duchy's political and economic autonomy.
The plaque denomination sits in a narrow window of Lotharingian silver issues that Saulcy documented with particular difficulty, noting inconsistent die workmanship across surviving specimens.