Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Pharkadon |
|---|---|
| Year | 425 BC - 375 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Hammered, Incuse |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Athena Parthenos standing to left in full figure, clad in peplos and wearing aegis, holding an upright spear in her right hand and resting her left hand upon a grounded shield at her side. A serpent coils to the left before her. The inscription ΦΑΡΚ appears in the field. The entire design is contained within a shallow incuse square, as is typical of early Thessalian civic coinage. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Pharkadon was a minor Thessalian polis in the Hestiaiotis region, perpetually overshadowed by the dominant leagues and powerful neighbors that shaped the region's fractious politics during the late fifth and early fourth centuries. That it struck its own silver coinage at all reflects the degree of local autonomy Thessalian cities occasionally managed to assert between periods of Macedonian or Larissaean dominance. The BCD Thessaly collection — assembled by a single private collector over decades — remains the defining reference for these obscure civic issues precisely because institutional collections rarely accumulated enough specimens to establish typology.