| Issuer | Athens |
|---|---|
| Year | 515 BC - 510 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Obol (⅙) |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | 0.61 g |
| Diameter | 8.0 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered, Incuse |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | HGC 4#1649 |
| Obverse description | Scarab beetle |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Quadripartite incuse square, divided diagonally. |
| Reverse script | |
| Reverse lettering | |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (515 BC - 510 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 2066824720 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Athenian obol, struck between 515 and 510 BC, emerges from the twilight years of the Peisistratid tyranny under Hippias, just prior to the democratic reforms of Cleisthenes. As a fractional silver denomination, it played a vital role in the burgeoning Athenian economy, facilitating daily transactions in the Agora. Its production reflects Athens' growing economic influence and control over the rich silver mines of Laurion, laying the groundwork for its later monetary supremacy in the Classical world. This period represents a crucial transition for Athens, both politically and economically.
Artistry: Characteristic of the late Archaic period, the artistry of this obol is anonymous, reflecting the collective craftsmanship of the Athenian mint rather than individual engravers. The minuscule 8mm flan presented significant challenges, resulting in designs that are often schematic and compact. While specific motifs vary, common types for this denomination include a gorgoneion or an early, compact rendition of Athena's head or a proto-owl. The style emphasizes essential forms, often with a robust, almost sculptural quality despite the coin's diminutive size, typical of Archaic Greek numismatic art.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 0.61 grams and measuring 8.0 millimeters, this silver obol exemplifies the technical limitations and achievements of Archaic minting. High-points for preservation would typically include the central features of the chosen design, such as the eyes or nose if a head, or prominent elements of a symbol. Due to the small flan and hand-striking methods, strikes are frequently off-center, and design elements may be partially present or weakly rendered. A well-centered strike with clear details on both sides is rare and highly prized, demonstrating superior craftsmanship for the era.