Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Castile, Kingdom of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1158-1214 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Obol (⅙) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Central device comprising a stylised triple-towered castle with crenellated battlements, rendered in the bold, schematic style characteristic of Castilian billon coinage of the late 12th and early 13th centuries. The castle occupies most of the field, with three prominent merloned towers rising above a rectangular body pierced by arched doorways. A beaded or rope border encircles the design. The legend CASSTELA runs around the periphery, identifying the Kingdom of Castile. Mintmarks appear to the left and right of the central device. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | CASSTELA (Translation: Castile) |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Alfonso VIII inherited the Castilian throne at age three in 1158, triggering two decades of noble faction-fighting over his regency — the de Lara and Castro families essentially held the kingdom hostage in turns. The meaja, the smallest denomination in the Castilian hierarchy, was the coin most likely to pass through common hands during those turbulent years, and the billon content of surviving examples varies noticeably, suggesting opportunistic debasement during periods when royal authority over the mints was effectively nominal.