See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Hemiobol

Issuer Phokaia
Year 525 BC - 500 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight 0.42 g
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Quadripartite incuse square divided into four recessed compartments by raised ridges meeting at the center, a hallmark of early Archaic Greek coinage technique. The four quarters display irregular surface textures resulting from the punch strike, with no figurative design or inscription present. The incuse is deeply impressed into the silver planchet, typical of the Phokaian hemiobol denomination of this period.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (525 BC - 500 BC)
Additional information

Phokaia's silver fractions from this period carry weight well beyond their tiny mass. The city was one of the most ambitious Greek colonizers of the archaic period — its merchants had established Massalia (modern Marseille) by around 600 BC and pushed trade routes deep into Iberia and the Black Sea. That commercial reach made small-denomination silver essential for everyday market transactions across a far-flung network of trading posts. The hemiobol was the working coin of port commerce, not ceremony.

Phokaia fell to the Persians under Harpagos around 545 BC, after which a significant portion of the population famously chose exile over submission, abandoning the city entirely. Coinage resumed under Persian suzerainty, and pieces attributable to the final decades of the sixth century reflect a mint operating under occupation.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE