See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Hemidrachm - 103rd Olympiad

Issuer Olympia
Year 368 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description An eagle stands in three-quarter view facing left, wings raised and slightly spread, rendered with strong naturalistic detail in the feathers of the wings and body. The bird is depicted standing on a rocky or plain ground line, occupying the majority of the reverse field. The abbreviated ethnic inscription F-A (digamma-alpha, for FAleion, i.e. of the Eleans) appears in the field, flanking the eagle. The composition reflects the high-quality die engraving associated with the sanctuary mint of Olympia during the Classical period.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Olympia (Elis)
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The 103rd Olympiad fell in 368 BC, a year when the sanctuary at Olympia was operating under unusual political strain. Elis, which had traditionally controlled the games and the mint, had been stripped of that authority by Sparta in 400 BC and then restored — the intervening decades left the coinage chronology of the sanctuary genuinely contested among specialists. Whether this hemidrachm was struck under Elean administration or during a period of external interference remains a point of scholarly disagreement tied directly to the dating of the BCD series.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE