Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Mint of Elbląg (Elbing) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1658-1663 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | First Zloty (1573-1795) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Crowned and armored bust of King John II Casimir Vasa facing right, wearing a cuirass with decorative collar and mantle. The effigy is set within an inner circle, with the royal crown positioned at the top of the portrait. A circular Latin legend surrounds the bust along the periphery of the coin. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | IOH·CAS·D·G·REX·P |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Elbląg operated as a Polish royal mint under Swedish occupation for much of the mid-seventeenth century, which makes the resumption of coinage there under Jan II Kazimierz politically charged. These ducats were struck in the years immediately following the catastrophic Swedish invasion known as the Potop — the Deluge — a conflict that devastated the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth's treasury and population so severely that some historians estimate the country lost a third of its inhabitants. Restoring a functioning gold coinage at Elbląg was as much a statement of recovered authority as it was a fiscal act.
The Kop. 7137–7139 range indicates multiple die variants across the emission period, and collectors should treat date attribution carefully — the 1658–1663 span encompasses meaningful differences in die workmanship.