See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Dukat elbląski - Jan II Kazimierz Waza Elbląg mint

Issuer Mint of Elbląg (Elbing)
Year 1658-1663
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency First Zloty (1573-1795)
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Crowned and armored bust of King John II Casimir Vasa facing right, wearing a cuirass with decorative collar and mantle. The effigy is set within an inner circle, with the royal crown positioned at the top of the portrait. A circular Latin legend surrounds the bust along the periphery of the coin.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering IOH·CAS·D·G·REX·P
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Elbląg operated as a Polish royal mint under Swedish occupation for much of the mid-seventeenth century, which makes the resumption of coinage there under Jan II Kazimierz politically charged. These ducats were struck in the years immediately following the catastrophic Swedish invasion known as the Potop — the Deluge — a conflict that devastated the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth's treasury and population so severely that some historians estimate the country lost a third of its inhabitants. Restoring a functioning gold coinage at Elbląg was as much a statement of recovered authority as it was a fiscal act.

The Kop. 7137–7139 range indicates multiple die variants across the emission period, and collectors should treat date attribution carefully — the 1658–1663 span encompasses meaningful differences in die workmanship.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE