Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
1/3 Ducat - Leopold I Breslau
| Issuer | Royal Mint of Silesia |
|---|---|
| Year | 1681-1690 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Milled |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Laureate and draped bust of Emperor Leopold I facing right, set within a beaded inner circle. The fractional denomination '1/3' appears in a cartouche at the bottom of the field, below the truncation. The emperor is depicted with his characteristic elongated features and flowing hair, rendered in the baroque court style typical of late 17th-century Habsburg coinage. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Breslau's mint operated under Habsburg authority throughout Leopold I's reign, but the 1680s were particularly fraught — Silesia was still absorbing the economic and demographic wreckage of the Thirty Years' War decades on, and Leopold's parallel military commitments against both the Ottomans and Louis XIV strained imperial finances severely. Small-denomination gold fractions like this were practical instruments for trade at a granular level, filling gaps that silver coinage could not efficiently cover in certain merchant transactions.
Herinek's numbering spanning 455–458 indicates multiple die pairings across this decade-long window, making attribution to a specific year within the range dependent on die study rather than inscription alone.