| Issuer | Olbia |
|---|---|
| Year | 550 BC - 500 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | |
| Diameter | |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Other |
| Technique | Cast |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | BMC Greek#362 |
| Obverse description | Leaping dolphin with dorsal fin, pectoral fin and raised lateral line |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Leaping dolphin with dorsal fin, pectoral fin and raised lateral line |
| Reverse script | |
| Reverse lettering | |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (550 BC - 500 BC) - There are varieties in weight and size - |
| Numisquare ID | 1539062130 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: The bronze 'Dolphin' coins of Olbia, issued between 550 BC and 500 BC, represent a unique form of early coinage from this prominent Greek colony on the Black Sea coast. During the Archaic period, Olbia flourished as a vital trading emporium, necessitating a local currency for everyday transactions. These distinctive pieces served as small change, reflecting the city-state's economic independence and its practical approach to commerce in a region where maritime trade was paramount.
Artistry: Lacking an identifiable engraver, the artistry of these 'Dolphin' coins adheres to an early Archaic stylistic tradition, characterized by its functional simplicity. The design is not a conventional coin format but rather a cast bronze object shaped like a dolphin. This choice was deeply symbolic, likely referencing the Black Sea's abundant marine life, which was crucial for Olbia's fishing and trade industries. The dolphin may also have represented a local deity, a symbol of good fortune, or the city's intrinsic maritime identity.
Technical/Grading: These 'Dolphin' coins were produced by casting, not striking, a method common for early bronze issues. Consequently, their technical strike qualities are inherently variable, often exhibiting casting flaws such as porosity, irregular edges, or remnants of sprue connections. Key high-points susceptible to wear include the dorsal fin, snout, and tail. Surviving examples are valued for their historical context and unique form, with BMC Greek#362 serving as a fundamental reference for cataloging these fascinating early numismatic artifacts.