| Issuer | Tortosa, Taifa of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1039-1054 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 1 Dirham (0.7) |
| Currency | |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | 3.97 g |
| Diameter | |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) |
| Obverse description | |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Arabic |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | |
| Reverse script | Arabic |
| Reverse lettering | |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (1039-1054) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1022014080 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This silver Dirham was issued by Muqatil, the Amir of Tortosa (Turtusha), during the tumultuous Taifa period (1039-1054 CE / 430-445 AH) in al-Andalus. Following the collapse of the Umayyad Caliphate of Córdoba, numerous independent Muslim city-states, or *taifas*, emerged. Muqatil, a *saqlabi* (Slavic) ruler, like many Taifa kings, asserted his sovereignty through coinage. Tortosa, a strategically vital port on the Ebro Delta, minted these dirhams to facilitate trade and affirm its autonomy amidst constant political fragmentation and external pressures from both neighboring Taifas and encroaching Christian kingdoms.
Artistry: The artistry of this Dirham adheres strictly to the aniconic tradition prevalent in Islamic numismatics of al-Andalus. No specific engraver's signature is known for Muqatil's Tortosan issues; die-sinkers typically remained anonymous. The design emphasizes sophisticated Kufic calligraphy, presenting the Shahada, various Quranic verses, the mint name (Turtusha), the date, and the ruler's name and titles. While often less refined than the grander Caliphal issues, the calligraphic style of the Tortosa mint reflects the regional variations and local interpretations of established Andalusi epigraphic norms, serving as both a religious and political statement.
Technical/Grading: For grading this Dirham type, several factors are paramount. A strong, even strike is crucial, particularly for the central legends containing Muqatil’s name and titles, and the full marginal inscriptions (mint and date), which are frequently off-center or weakly struck. Clarity of the Kufic script, without significant areas of flat strike or mushiness, is highly desirable. The planchet quality—absence of major cracks, laminations, or excessive porosity—also contributes significantly. Given the 3.97g weight, a coin close to its full weight, exhibiting minimal wear on the high points of the calligraphy and possessing an attractive, original cabinet patina, would command a premium.