Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Dynasts of Lycia (Achaemenid Satrapies) |
|---|---|
| Year | 470 BC - 440 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Diobol (⅓) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | K |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (470 BC - 440 BC) |
| Additional information |
Kuprilli was among the earliest named dynasts of Lycia to strike coins in his own name, operating under loose Achaemenid suzerainty at a time when Persian administrative control over the southwestern Anatolian coast was exercised more through tribute and loyalty than direct governance. His issues are notable precisely because they assert a local dynastic identity — the use of a Lycian name rather than a Hellenized one places this coinage firmly within a pre-Hellenization stratum of Anatolian numismatics. The diobol denomination served the small-transaction economy of a maritime region deeply integrated into Aegean trade networks despite its nominal Persian allegiance.