Dichalkon

Issuer Heraia
Year 275 BC - 225 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Dichalkon (1⁄24)
Currency Drachm
Composition Bronze
Weight 1.97 g
Diameter 14.0 mm
Thickness
Shape Round (irregular)
Technique Hammered
Orientation
Engraver(s)
In circulation to
Reference(s) BCD Peloponnesos#1371.1
Obverse description Helmeted head of Athena facing right
Obverse script
Obverse lettering
Reverse description Large H with QE to the right
Reverse script Greek
Reverse lettering
Edge
Mint
Mintage ND (275 BC - 225 BC) - Struck mid 3rd century BC or later -
Numisquare ID 8407484790
Additional information

Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by Heraia, an important Arcadian city in the Peloponnesos, during the turbulent Hellenistic period (275 BC - 225 BC). Following Alexander the Great's death, this era saw the rise of successor kingdoms and powerful leagues, like the Achaean League, which often influenced or absorbed independent city-states. Heraia, strategically located, navigated complex alliances. This bronze coinage served as essential local currency, reflecting the city's continued economic activity and civic identity amidst shifting political landscapes.

Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, typical of minor bronze issues, the coin's design adheres to the prevailing Hellenistic stylistic school. The obverse likely features a diademed head of Hera, the city's patron goddess, rendered with a characteristic blend of classical idealism and emerging naturalism. The reverse typically displays a civic emblem or an abbreviated legend. Despite the small flan, the artistry aimed for a robust, recognizable depiction, albeit with less intricate detail than contemporary silver issues.

Technical/Grading: Struck on a small, 14.0 mm, 1.97 gram bronze flan, this Dichalkon often exhibits variability in strike quality. High-points on the obverse, such as Hera's diadem, hair, and facial features, are frequently the first areas to show wear or be softly struck due to die pressure. Central elements of the reverse device are similarly susceptible. Collectors should prioritize a well-centered strike, full details on both sides, and minimal flan imperfections or significant die wear to assess its technical merit and overall grade.

×