Dichalkon

Émetteur Troezen
Année 370 BC - 300 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Valeur Dichalkon (1⁄24)
Devise Drachm
Composition Bronze
Poids 5.60 g
Diamètre 18 mm
Épaisseur 3 mm
Forme Round (irregular)
Technique Hammered
Orientation
Graveur(s)
En circulation jusqu’à
Référence(s) BMC Greek#1339.1
Description de l’avers Helmeted head of Athena left
Écriture de l’avers
Légende de l’avers
Description du revers Ornate trident head with dolphin
Écriture du revers Greek
Légende du revers TPO
Tranche
Atelier
Tirage ND (370 BC - 300 BC) - -
ID Numisquare 5580727310
Informations supplémentaires

Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by Troezen between 370 BC and 300 BC, a period of profound geopolitical change. It spanned the decline of Spartan and Theban hegemonies, the rise of Macedon under Philip II and Alexander the Great, and subsequent early Hellenistic fragmentation. Troezen, an autonomous Peloponnesian city, navigated these power shifts. Minting bronze coinage for local commerce signifies a practical economic need for smaller denominations, reflecting robust internal economy and civic administration.

Artistry: While the engraver remains anonymous, this Dichalkon's design aligns with Late Classical to Early Hellenistic stylistic traditions. The obverse typically features a laureate head of Poseidon, Troezen's patron deity, rendered with dignified realism. The reverse commonly displays his iconic trident, often with a dolphin, reinforcing Troezen's strong maritime connection and mythical origins. This artistic execution, though simplified for bronze issues, effectively conveys the city's reverence for its divine protector and heritage.

Technical/Grading: This bronze Dichalkon, weighing 5.60 grams and measuring 18 millimeters, represents a standard denomination. Optimal grading requires a well-centered strike with full details on high-points, such as Poseidon's hair, facial features, and trident prongs. Bronze coinage from this era often shows variable strike quality, including minor off-centering or incomplete impressions due to less precise techniques than silver. Flan preparation and absence of significant corrosion are crucial in assessing its technical merit.

×