Catalog
Denier - William I Groningen, busts right
| Issuer | Bishopric of Utrecht |
|---|---|
| Year | 1054-1076 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | ✠ WIHELMVS (Translation: William) |
| Reverse description | Crowned bust of King Henry (likely Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor) facing right, with a cross-tipped staff depicted before the effigy and a stylized floral ornament behind, rendered in the same crude hammered technique as the obverse. The royal crown is clearly delineated above the head. A Latin legend naming the king encircles the design in the outer field, asserting the imperial authority under which this episcopal coinage was struck. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
William I of Utrecht held the see from 1054 until his death in 1076, appointed directly by Henry III and operating squarely within the imperial church system. The Groningen mint was among several active episcopal minting sites in the diocese, reflecting Utrecht's unusual position as one of the most economically significant ecclesiastical lordships in the northern Low Countries. Episcopal coinage here was not incidental — it was a deliberate instrument of fiscal and political authority within territories where comital power was comparatively weak.
Kluge Kar. 384 places this type within a narrow attributional framework for Salian-period episcopal issues, where distinguishing individual bishop's coinages often depends on subtle die characteristics rather than explicit legends.