Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Monnaie de Paris |
|---|---|
| Year | 1607 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Two fleurs-de-lis arranged side by side in the central field, with the mint mark letter A positioned below, denoting the Paris mint. The peripheral legend DENIER TOVRNOIS 1607, separated by asterisks and introduced by a cross pattee, encircles the design. The composition is characteristic of the tournois coinage of Henri IV, with the fleurs-de-lis serving as the principal heraldic devices of the French crown. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Piéforts were not struck for circulation — they served as official weight and die standards, presentation pieces, or proof-of-work submissions to the crown. A quadruple-weight piéfort of the denier tournois is among the more emphatic demonstrations of the type: four times the standard planchet thickness run through the same dies, demanding exceptional die pressure and leaving virtually no impression weakness. Henri IV's mint administration at Tours — the origin of the tournois denomination centuries earlier — maintained a rigorous documentation practice, and pieces like this likely accompanied official assay records.
The CGKL citation as "cf. 224" signals no exact parallel has been catalogued, placing this among unrecorded or only loosely attributed piéfort variants.