See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier - Pepin the Short Saint Gaugericus abbey of Cambrai

Issuer Unified Carolingian Empire
Year 751-768
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Abbreviated votive legend in large, boldly struck capital letters occupying the central field, reading SCI GAV in reference to Saint Gaugericus, patron of the abbey of Cambrai. A horizontal bar appears above the inscription, mirroring the obverse design convention. The legend fills the flan with a border of pellets around the periphery, consistent with the hammered fabric of Carolingian ecclesiastical deniers.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Pépin le Bref inherited a degraded Merovingian coinage and systematically overhauled it, replacing the gold tremissis with a heavier silver denier as the backbone of Frankish commerce — a reform formalized around 755 and enforced through royal monopoly over minting. Cambrai's issue draws authority from Saint Gaugericus, the seventh-century bishop who effectively founded the city as an episcopal center, his cult providing the ecclesiastical legitimacy that justified a local striking operation under royal sanction.

The Nouchy reference places this among a small, well-documented group. Gariel and Morrison both catalogue it; its absence from Prou is a known gap in that corpus rather than a reflection of rarity.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE