See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier - Louis II

Issuer Brandenburg, Margraviate of
Year 1351-1365
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter 14 mm
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse displays a bold foliate or trefoil motif in the upper left quadrant, flanked by curved ornamental elements that may represent stylized wing or scroll forms. Two annulet or pellet devices appear in the lower field on either side of the central design. The composition is arranged symmetrically about a vertical axis within a plain inner border, consistent with the hammered bracteate-influenced pfennig coinage of Margrave Louis II of Brandenburg. The fabric is thin and the flan slightly irregular with a notch at the rim.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (1351-1365)
Additional information

Louis II ruled Brandenburg during a period when the Wittelsbachs held the margraviate through a legitimacy dispute so tangled it drew papal intervention — his father Louis IV, Holy Roman Emperor, had controversially awarded himself the territory after the extinction of the Ascanian line. The small silver deniers struck under Louis II reflect the fragmented monetary production of the mid-fourteenth century March, where local ecclesiastical and secular mints operated with considerable independence from any central standard.

The weight of surviving examples varies enough to suggest inconsistent bullion supply rather than deliberate debasement.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE