See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier - Immobilization of Geoffrey II under Fulk IV or Fulk V

Issuer Anjou, County of
Year 1069-1120
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Central field occupied by the stylized monogram of Fulk, composed of interlaced letters within a beaded or linear inner circle, a design derived from the Carolingian monogram tradition. The monogram is crudely rendered in the hammered style characteristic of Angevin feudal coinage, with strokes that are somewhat worn and irregular due to die deterioration from repeated immobilized use. The surrounding legend, referencing the city of Angers, runs clockwise in debased Latin capitals around the inner circle.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (1069-1120)
Additional information

The "immobilized" deniers of Anjou present a fascinating administrative artifact: when a coin type proved widely accepted, later counts simply continued striking it under a predecessor's name rather than issuing new types. This piece perpetuates the identity of Geoffrey II (Martel the Younger, d. 1106) across the reigns of Fulk IV Rechin and possibly Fulk V, a span during which Anjou was deeply entangled in conflicts with both Maine and the Norman duchy under William Rufus and later Henry I.

Attribution between Fulk IV and Fulk V remains genuinely difficult without die-study context. Billon content varies across the series, reflecting periodic debasements rather than minting inconsistency.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE