Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Stolberg, County of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1302-1329 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | A stag passant to the right, depicted in relief above a semicircular arch, all rendered in the characteristic single-sided struck bracteate style. The stag is shown with stylized antlers and body in a simplified, bold design typical of medieval German minor coinage. The entire motif is contained within a beaded inner circle, itself surrounded by a plain outer border with irregular flan edges characteristic of bracteate production. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (1302-1329) |
| Additional information |
The counts of Stolberg, a small Harz region territory, issued these thin-flan bracteates during a period when the type was already commercially obsolete across most of Germany — double-sided pfennig coinage had taken over major minting centers by the late thirteenth century. Stolberg persisted with single-sided production well into the fourteenth century, partly from conservatism and partly because the bracteate's lower silver requirement suited a county of modest mining output.
Henry V's long reign across this bracket makes precise dating within the 1302–1329 window nearly impossible without die-linkage studies.