Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Denier Anonyme
| Issuer | Duchy of Normandy (French States) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1025-1050 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | 0.5 mm |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Pseudo-legend surrounds a central cross with cantons decorated alternately: a small croisette appears in the first and fourth quarters, while a pellet or besant occupies the second and third quarters. The degenerate inscription, unintelligible as a coherent legend, is consistent with anonymous Norman feudal deniers of this period, where decorative imitation of Carolingian prototypes replaced meaningful text. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Ducal Normandy in this period operated with a deliberately decentralized monetary system — the dukes issued coinage anonymously to avoid subordinating their currency to any single political identity, a calculated ambiguity that served them well during the turbulent decades before the Conquest. The anonymous attribution also complicated ecclesiastical and royal efforts to assert control over Norman minting rights.
The "var." designation against Féodales#28 suggests this piece departs from the more common die alignment or cross form documented by Poey d'Avant — worth cross-referencing against the relevant plates before pricing.