Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Hungary |
|---|---|
| Year | 1205-1235 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Denier (Denár) (1) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Frontal bust of King Andrew II, crowned with a beaded crown, depicted in a stylized Romanesque manner. The king holds a sword upright in his right hand and a patriarchal cross-tipped orb in his left hand. The effigy is shown in high relief within a plain inner circle, with the flat field bearing no legend. Facial features are rendered schematically with large eyes and a symmetrical composition characteristic of early 13th-century Hungarian coinage. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (1205-1235) |
| Additional information |
Andrew II's reign was defined less by monetary policy than by the 1222 Golden Bull — Hungary's equivalent of Magna Carta, wrested from him by disgruntled nobles after years of catastrophic land giveaways he called the "new institutions." The chronic fiscal strain of his disastrous Fifth Crusade (1217–1218), which accomplished essentially nothing, left the royal treasury depleted and the coinage correspondingly thin and broadly distributed across a long striking window.
Multiple reference systems catalog this type, reflecting genuine scholarly disagreement about die groupings within the 1205–1235 span.