See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier

Issuer Melgueil, County of
Year 1101-1200
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Four annulets arranged in cruciform pattern around a central pellet, set within a plain inner circle, dominate the field. The surrounding legend is degenerate and partially legible, a hallmark of the heavily worn and stylistically degraded coinage of the County of Melgueil. The letters of the legend, reading NAIDONA, represent a corrupted rendering of NARBONA (Narbonne), the associated mint or monetary authority. The entire design is enclosed within a beaded outer border, visible on this well-struck but irregularly shaped flan. The image shown displays this reverse type clearly, with the four ringed pellets in their characteristic cross arrangement.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The deniers of Melgueil occupied an outsized commercial role relative to the county's modest political standing. Minted under the bishops of Maguelone, who held effective monetary authority over the region, these coins circulated aggressively throughout Languedoc and into northern Italy and Catalonia — referenced explicitly in twelfth-century contracts as the preferred denomination for land transactions and ecclesiastical dues. Their ubiquity in documentary sources is striking.

The type ran with remarkable consistency across multiple issuing authorities, which is precisely why Poey d'Avant lists two sequential references for what is functionally the same coin.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE