See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Chalkon - Mithridates

Issuer Kingdom of Armenia Minor (Greater Armenia)
Year 180 BC - 170 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Chalkon (1⁄48)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Draped bust of King Mithradates facing left, wearing the characteristic upright bashlyk headdress. The effigy is rendered in a crude, provincial style typical of early Armenian bronze coinage. A legend in Armenian script encircles the bust within the field, though heavily worn and largely illegible on most specimens. The flan is irregularly shaped, consistent with hand-struck production of the period.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (180 BC - 170 BC)
Additional information

Mithridates of Armenia Minor ruled a client kingdom caught between the declining Seleucid empire and the rising power of Rome, with his coinage reflecting a ruler working hard to project legitimacy on limited resources. Bronze issues of this weight class were the workhorse denomination of small Hellenistic economies, filling the gap left by silver that was frequently extracted as tribute or hoarded.

Attribution to this specific Mithridates remains debated in the literature — Armenian Minor produced several rulers of that name across the second century BC, and die studies have not conclusively separated their issues.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE