Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Roman Imperial Mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 285-289 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | RIC V.2#171 |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | IMP DIOCLETIANVS AVG |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (285-289) - "XXIZ" in exergue; |
| Additional information |
Diocletian struck these issues during the early years of his reign, before the monetary reforms of 294 AD fundamentally restructured Roman coinage. The antoninianus by this point had degraded so far from its third-century silver content that even these nominally "silver" pieces carry only a thin surface wash over a largely base-metal core — the product of decades of fiscal crisis and military expenditure that successive emperors had never managed to arrest. Diocletian's solution, when it finally came, was the argenteus and the follis, effectively killing the antoninianus as a denomination entirely.