Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Roman Imperial Mint (Tripolis) |
|---|---|
| Year | 284-290 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Antoninianus (1) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | IMP C C VAL DIOCLETIANVS P F AVG |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Tripolis, modern-day Tripoli, Lebanon |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Tripolis was an uncommon mint for Diocletian's early coinage, activated partly to supply the eastern armies during his consolidation of power following the murder of Numerian in 284 AD — the very event that brought Diocletian to the throne. The mint's output in this period is noticeably sparse in surviving collections, and RIC V.2 330 is among the scarcer attributions from this facility.
The silvering on antoninianii from Tripolis is frequently degraded, as the billon composition was already well below the silver content that had defined the denomination a generation earlier. Aurelian's reforms had stabilized it briefly, but by Diocletian's accession the alloy was again inconsistent mint to mint.