See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Æ26 - Marcus Aurelius C L I COR

Issuer Corinth (Achaea)
Year 161-180
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Laureate, draped, and cuirassed bust of Marcus Aurelius facing right, portrayed in the imperial Roman provincial style. The circumferential legend in Latin reads M AVR ANTONINVS AVG, identifying the emperor by his Antonine nomenclature and tribunician title Augustus. The portrait exhibits the characteristic mature features of Marcus Aurelius, with a bearded visage and paludamentum visible at the shoulder. The surface shows heavy patination consistent with a provincial bronze striking of the Antonine period.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering M AVR ANTONINVS AVG
(Translation: Marcus Aurelius Augustus)
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Corinth's provincial bronze coinage under Marcus Aurelius was produced by a city still operating under the Roman colonial framework established by Julius Caesar in 44 BC, when Corinth was refounded as Colonia Laus Iulia Corinthiensis after a century of deliberately enforced abandonment following its destruction by Mummius in 146 BC. The magistrate abbreviation C L I COR — Colonia Laus Iulia Corinthiensis — appears with particular consistency on Aurelian-period issues, suggesting a deliberate civic assertion of colonial identity at a moment when the city was navigating the administrative pressures of the Antonine plague and the Marcomannic Wars simultaneously.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE