See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Æ26 - Gallienus (sole reign) (ΛΑΚΕΔΑΙΜΟΝΙωΝ, ΑϹ Δ)

Issuer Sparta (Achaea)
Year 260-268
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) X#59724
Obverse description Laureate and cuirassed bust of Emperor Gallienus facing left, depicted from the front, rendered in the provincial Greek style. The emperor's armoured breastplate is rendered in detail, conveying imperial authority. The encircling Greek legend names Gallienus in the accusative case, consistent with honorific civic coinage of the Peloponnesian region. The portrait displays the characteristic style of mid-third-century Lacedaemonian bronzes.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (260-268)
Additional information

Sparta's civic bronze coinage under Gallienus belongs to the final gasp of Greek provincial issues — the city's minting activity ceased entirely around the time of the Herulian sack of 267 AD, which devastated much of southern Greece. Whether this particular piece predates that destruction or squeezed out just before the city's collapse into disorder is impossible to determine with certainty, but the window is narrow.

The ΑϹ Δ in the reference suggests a fourth year of a local magistracy or civic reckoning — an administrative detail that has resisted firm scholarly consensus on its precise correlation to absolute dates.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE